Prediction of Ann Li [63rd] vs Kimberly Birrell [61st] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L L L L W L
Form
W W W L W W W L L WH2H: Li 1 - 0 Birrell
They have played 2 sets in total, with Li winning 2 and Birrell winning 0. The last match between Li and Birrell was at the Singapore Open - Singapore, 31-01-2025, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Ann Li getting the victory 7-6(2) 7-6(4).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ann Li | 1 |
| Kimberly Birrell | 0 |
| Li | Stats | Birrell |
|---|---|---|
| 53% (9-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 75% (21-7) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 63 | Ranking | 61 |
| 44 | Highest Rank | 61 |
| 24 | Age | 26 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 5 | Titles | 7 |
| 60% (239-162) | Career Total W/L | 56% (242-194) |
| $1,350,835 | Career Prize Money | $891,948 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Ann Li
Player
Kimberly Birrell
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 14 | Games Won | 12 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:45:44 | Average Match Time | 1:45:44 |
| 63% (52/83) | 1st Serve % | 65% (48/74) |
| 71% (37/52) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (35/48) |
| 58% (18/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 31% (8/26) |
| 100% (4/4) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (4/6) |
| 42% (31/74) | Return Points Win % | 34% (28/83) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ann Li vs Kimberly Birrell Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Li 1 - 0 Birrell
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Li has won 41.14% of points on their second serve, while Birrell has won 45.56%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Li, in recent form, has won 49.78% of their opponent's second serve points, while Birrell has won 47.99%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.96% and 30.41% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Li has saved 47.37% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Birrell has saved 48.49% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Li has won 63.51% of matches played (W/L 47/ 27), with Birrell winning 68.54% (W/L 61/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Li has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 71/ 40), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 7/ 14). Birrell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 180/ 129), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 27% (W/L 4/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Li has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.29% of matches (W/L 28/ 13), where as Birrell has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 71.43% of matches (W/L 25/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Li winning 1 times and Birrell being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Li winning 2 and Birrell winning 0. The last match between Li and Birrell was at the Singapore Open - Singapore, 31-01-2025, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Ann Li getting the victory 7-6(2) 7-6(4).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:45:44.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Li and Birrell have played a deciding set 0 times, with Li winning 0 times and Birrell 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Li winning 2, and Birrell 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Li has played against opponents with an average rank of 164.45 while Birrell has played against players with an average rank of 212.52.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Li has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Birrell has won 62% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Li has converted 41.1% of breakpoint opportunities, and Birrell has converted 38.91% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ann Li Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ekaterina Alexandrova
Player
Ann Li
48%
(
28 of
58)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
66)
4
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Anna Blinkova
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taylor Townsend
Player
Ann Li
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
49 of
83)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
40 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Irina-Camelia Begu
Player
Ann Li
53%
(
41 of
77)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
84)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eva Lys
Player
Ann Li
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
48%
(
33 of
69)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
4-6 6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Ann Li
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Anna Kalinskaya
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
25%
(
3 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
54
Total Points Won
44
|
7-6(2) 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Kimberly Birrell
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(2) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Maria Timofeeva
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Daria Saville
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Kimberly Birrell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Marta Kostyuk
Player
Kimberly Birrell
52%
(
50 of
97)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
43%
(
20 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
92
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Anastasia Potapova
67%
(
64 of
96)
1st Serve %
52%
(
52 of
100)
3
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
2
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
39 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Harriet Dart
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
49%
(
38 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Kimberly Birrell
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
10
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Viktorija Golubic
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
1
Aces
0
12
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
33 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Cristina Bucsa
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Kristina Penickova
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Li vs Birrell?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Li Vs Birrell is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (239/162) | Win/Loss | 56% (242/194) |
| 57% (524/393) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (554/474) |
| 53% (4475/3958) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (4993/4672) |
| 0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 861 | Aces Total | 735 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 958 | Total Double Faults | 1564 |
| 1:27:52 | Average Match Time | 1:35:29 |
| 354.68 | Average Opponent Rank | 406.71 |
| 60% (15845/26216) | 1st Serve % | 63% (17087/27079) |
| 63% (10043/15845) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (10840/17087) |
| 47% (4903/10371) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (4539/9995) |
| 48% (1539/3194) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1554/3408) |
| 45% (11701/25779) | Return Points Win % | 45% (12463/27749) |
| 59% (232/391) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (238/430) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 54% (44/81) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (57/117) |
| 59% (70/118) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (85/156) |
| 87% (222/194) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (227/195) |
| 13% (222/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (227/32) |
| 25% (179/45) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (209/46) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
